The source stays attached
- Why
- A finding is difficult to review when you cannot see where it came from.
- In n1
- Each finding we pull out keeps a link back to its original source page.
Product principles
Four commitments you can test in n1.
Each one governs how n1 handles source evidence, review state, time, and its own limits.
How we build
Each commitment has a visible test.
Drafts stay under clinician review
- Why
- Sorted data is not the same as a clinical call.
- In n1
- The clinician checks the source pages, edits the report, and chooses what is shared.
Time stays visible
- Why
- The latest result can hide how fast, and in which direction, things moved.
- In n1
- Dates stay with each value, so you can review change alongside context.
The scope stays explicit
- Why
- An AI-generated interpretation is not a reviewed clinical conclusion.
- In n1
- n1 can draft notes on what results may mean, but a doctor must check, edit, and decide how to use them.
Hold us to these commitments
Ask four questions in every workflow.
- 01Can I open the source page?
- 02Can I see what still needs review?
- 03Can I follow the recorded timeline?
- 04Is n1’s role separate from clinical judgement?
The team
The people behind the commitments.
Doctors, engineers and researchers build n1 together. The doctor who uses it keeps the clinical call. We stay on the hook for how the product works.
Jean-Yves SireauFounder & CEO
Leah EliseDirector of Clinical Partnerships and Marketing
Dr. Dannette KallayIntegrative Physician
Neshalini SathiabalanClinical Research Coordinator
Siew Mei LauClinical Research Coordinator
Arun VenkataramanPrincipal Engineer
Jasper MiddendorpEngineering Manager
Aniruddha DeshpandeSenior AI Engineer
Umar ShahSenior AI Engineer
Coen ElferinkSenior Frontend Developer
Darpan BafanaDevOps Engineer
Yousuf SarfrazAI Engineer
Jun An TanAI Engineer
Paawan PurdhaniAI EngineerTest the four commitments yourself.
Open a sample report. Follow the timeline. Then see if what we claim matches what the report says.